Borrowing a page from the New
Democrat playbook, Mayor-elect
Anthony A. Williams of the District
of Columbia announced in late December
that he will allow public
workers to bid against private companies
to deliver a wide variety of
city services.
Williams, who was a featured
speaker at the DLC's annual conference
in December, announced his
plan to introduce "managed competition"
in the delivery of city services
after meeting with Indianapolis
Mayor Steve Goldsmith and
representatives of that city's municipal
unions. Goldsmith, a moderate
Republican, has been at the forefront
of the small but growing national
movement to permit public
workers to bid against private companies
for contracts to collect trash,
repair streets, maintain vehicle
fleets, and the like. Managed competition
programs typically do not
extend to essential city services
such as fire and police protection.
"Reinventing government" experts
David Osborne and Peter
Plastrik profiled the Indianapolis
program in The New Democrat last
year ("Empowerment in the Public
Sector," TND, March/April 1998).
They noted that from 1992 to 1996,
managed competition cut that city's
costs by more than $100 million.
Last month, The Washington Post
quoted Goldsmith as saying the
savings have since risen to $400
million. Goldsmith reportedly told
Williams that Indianapolis has used
those savings to leverage more than
$1 billion in infrastructure improvements,
including neighborhood revitalization
and putting more police
officers on the streets.
As Osborne and Plastrik noted
in their TND article, managed competition
does not necessarily translate
into layoffs for union members.
Indianapolis, for example, has
eliminated 1,150 of the 4,691 city
jobs that existed when the program
began in 1992. Yet as of the spring
of 1997, the city had not laid off a
single union worker. Most of the
1,150 ex-city workers took jobs with
private contractors or found other
work in the private sector, were retrained
for different government
positions, or took early retirement.
The city did, however, cut middle
management, for example eliminating
18 of the 36 supervisors who
managed the 90 union workers responsible
for patching potholes.
"I am fervently committed to
pursuing this aggressively in a
way that supports working people
but gets the job done for the citizens,"
Williams told the Post. "This
is a very, very high priority. I think
if we give people the chance to
compete, we could have a tremendous
impact. The question is: Who
can do this best?"
District of Columbia labor leaders
greeted Williams' announcement
with a mixture of openness
and caution.
"We know that there have to be
changes in D.C. government, but
we want to be in on these changes
at the beginning -- not at the end,"
Chuck Hicks, president of Labor
Council 20 of the American Federation
of State, County, and Municipal
Employees, told the Post. "Certainly
we'll take a look at managed
competition, but we need to be on a
level playing field. We need training and resources made available
to labor unions to compete in a fair
and equitable manner."