Sometimes new policy ideas are not a matter of creating new public institutions.
They instead involve modernizing existing institutions for a new mission reflecting new
circumstances. That's the case with the venerable institution of summer school.
In recent years, summer school has mostly served as a sleepy redoubt for kids
whose
parents want them to get extra education, either to catch up with or move ahead of their
peers. But with the semi-universal adoption of "social promotion" policies,
few students are required to go to summer school, because few are denied promotion to
the next grade so long as they attend school regularly (a sad example of Woody Allen's
adage that "90 percent of life is just showing up").
But with parents and taxpayers increasingly demanding an end to social
promotion--a
trend endorsed by President Clinton in his 1998 State of the Union Address--summer
school suddenly has a powerful new purpose: to help kids who cannot meet new and
higher standards for promotion to the next grade level to "catch up" before
September.
Chicago showed the way last year in its pioneering "no social
promotion"
initiative. Eighth graders who did not score better than the seventh-grade level on the
Iowa Test of Basic Skills were required to go to summer school and try again, only
repeating the grade if the extra schooling did not get them over the bar. Now, according
to The New York Times, New York City Schools Chancellor Rudy Crew is
proposing that
elementary school students must pass reading tests to be promoted to the next grade.
But he has linked this proposal, which would be implemented after an intensive
two-year remedial education effort, with an expansion of summer school programs to
accommodate an estimated 220,000 students rather than last year's 54,000. This will cost
some serious money about $100 million a year, according to Dr. Crew.
At a time when politicians in both parties are talking about increased spending on
education for purposes ranging from private school vouchers, scholarships or
tax-preferred savings accounts, to hiring more teachers to reduce class sizes, expanding
summer schools should draw much more attention. After all, it's the key to a hugely
important performance-based education reform: instituting higher standards with real
consequences. It's also a good example of an initiative that links the responsibility to do
more with the opportunity to do well.
As Rudy Crew told the Times, "This is not about being punitive
with kids and
playing gotcha. This is about caring so much about children that you will not let them
fail."