NUCLEAR
TERRORISM: The Ultimate Preventable Catastrophe
by
Graham Allison
Times Books, 272 pp, $24.00
On October 11, 2001, a
month to the day after
the terrorist assault on
the World Trade Center
and the Pentagon,
President George W. Bush faced an
even more terrifying prospect. At that
morning's Presidential Daily
Intelligence Briefing, George Tenet, the
director of central intelligence,
informed the president that a CIA
agent code-named Dragonfire had
reported that Al Qaeda terrorists possessed
a ten-kiloton nuclear bomb, evidently
stolen from the Russian arsenal.
According to Dragonfire, this nuclear
weapon was now on American soil, in
New York City.
The CIA had no independent confirmation
of this report, but neither did it
have any basis on which to dismiss it.
Did Russia's arsenal include a large number
of ten-kiloton weapons? Yes. Could
the Russian government account for all
the nuclear weapons the Soviet Union
had built during the Cold War? No.
Could Al Qaeda have acquired one or
more of these weapons? Yes. Could it
have smuggled a nuclear weapon through
American border controls into New York
City without anyone's knowledge? Yes. In
a moment of gallows humor, someone
quipped that the terrorists could have
wrapped the bomb in one of the bales of
marijuana that are routinely smuggled
into cities like New York.
In the hours that followed, national
security adviser Condoleezza Rice analyzed
what strategists call the "problem
from hell." Unlike the Cold War, when
the United States and the Soviet Union
knew that an attack against the other
would elicit a retaliatory strike or greater
measure, Al Qaeda -- with no return
address -- had no such fear of
reprisal. Even if the president
were prepared to negotiate, Al
Qaeda had no phone number
to call.
Clearly no decision could be taken
without much more information about
the threat and those behind it. But how
could Rice engage a wider circle of
experts and analysts without the White
House's suspicions leaking to the press?
A CNN flash that the White House
had information about an Al Qaeda
nuclear weapon in Manhattan would
create chaos. New Yorkers would flee
the city in terror, and residents of other
metropolitan areas would panic. The
stock market, which was just then stabilizing
from the shock of 9/11, could
collapse.
American Hiroshima. Concerned that
Al Qaeda could have smuggled a nuclear
weapon into Washington as well, the
president ordered Vice President Dick
Cheney to leave the capital for an "undisclosed
location," where he would remain
for many weeks to follow. This was standard
procedure to ensure "continuity of
government" in case of a decapitation
strike against the U.S. political leadership.
Several hundred federal employees
from more than a dozen government
agencies joined the vice president at this
secret site, the core of an alternative government
that would seek to cope in the
aftermath of a nuclear explosion that
destroyed Washington. The president
also immediately dispatched NEST specialists
(Nuclear Emergency Support
Teams of scientists and engineers) to
New York to search for the weapon. But
no one in the city was informed of the
threat, not even Mayor Rudolph
Giuliani.
Six months earlier the CIA's Counterterrorism
Center had picked up chatter in
Al Qaeda channels about an "American
Hiroshima." The CIA knew that Osama
bin Laden's fascination with nuclear
weapons went back at least to 1992,
when he attempted to buy highly
enriched uranium from South Africa. Al
Qaeda operatives were alleged to have
negotiated with Chechen separatists in
Russia to buy a nuclear warhead, which
the Chechen warlord Shamil Basayev
claimed to have acquired from Russian
arsenals. The CIA's special task force on
Al Qaeda had noted the terrorist
group's emphasis on thorough planning,
intensive training,
and repetition
of successful
tactics. The task force also highlighted Al
Qaeda's strong preference for symbolic
targets and spectacular attacks.
Staggering the imagination. As the
CIA's analysts examined Dragonfire's
report and compared it with other bits
of information, they noted that the
attack on the World Trade Center in
September had set the bar higher for
future terrorist spectaculars. Psychologically,
a nuclear attack would stagger
the world's imagination as dramatically
as 9/11 did. Considering where Al
Qaeda might detonate such a bomb,
they noted that New York was, in the
jargon of national security experts, "target
rich." Among hundreds of potential
targets, what could be more compelling
than Times Square, the most
famous address in the self-proclaimed
capital of the
world?
Amid this sea of unknowns,
analysts could definitively
answer at least one question. They
knew what kind of devastation a nuclear
explosion would cause. If Al Qaeda
was to rent a van to carry the ten-kiloton
Russian weapon into the heart of
Times Square and detonate it adjacent
to the Morgan Stanley headquarters at
1585 Broadway, Times Square would
vanish in the twinkling of an eye. The
blast would generate temperatures
reaching into the tens of millions of
degrees Fahrenheit. The resulting fireball
and blast wave would destroy
instantaneously the theater district, the
New York Times building, Grand
Central Terminal, and every other
structure within a third of a mile of the
point of detonation. The ensuing
firestorm would engulf Rockefeller
Center, Carnegie Hall, the Empire
State Building, and Madison Square
Garden, leaving a landscape resembling
the World Trade Center site. From the
United Nations headquarters on the
East River and the Lincoln Tunnel
under the Hudson River, to the
Metropolitan Museum in the eighties
and the Flatiron Building in the twenties,
structures would remind one of
the Alfred P. Murrah Federal Office
Building following the Oklahoma City
bombing.
On a normal workday, more than
half a million people crowd the area
within a half-mile radius of Times
Square. A noon detonation in midtown
Manhattan could kill them all.
Hundreds of thousands of others
would die from collapsing buildings,
fire, and fallout in the ensuing hours.
The electromagnetic pulse generated
by the blast would fry cell phones,
radios, and other electronic communications.
Hospitals, doctors, and emergency
services would be overwhelmed
by the wounded. Firefighters would be
battling an uncontrolled ring of fires
for many days thereafter.
The threat of nuclear terrorism,
moreover, is not limited to New York
City. While New York is widely seen as
the most likely target, it is clear that Al
Qaeda is not only capable of, but also
interested in, mounting attacks on
other American cities, where people
may be less prepared. Imagine the consequences
of a ten-kiloton weapon
exploding in San Francisco, Houston,
Washington, Chicago, Los Angeles, or
any other city Americans call home.
From the epicenter of the blast to a
distance of approximately a third of a
mile, every structure and individual
would vanish in a vaporous haze. A
second circle of destruction, extending
three-quarters of a mile from ground
zero, would leave buildings looking
like the Murrah building in Oklahoma
City. A third circle, reaching out one
and one-half miles, would be ravaged
by fires and radiation.
Uncontrollable blaze. In Washington,
a bomb going off at the Smithsonian
Institution would destroy everything
from the White House to the lawn of the
Capitol building; everything from the
Supreme Court to the FDR Memorial
would be left in rubble; uncontrollable
fires would reach all the way out to the
Pentagon.
In a cover story in the New York
Times Magazine in May 2002, Bill
Keller interviewed Eugene Habiger,
the retired four-star general who had
overseen strategic nuclear weapons
until 1998 and had run nuclear
antiterror programs for the Department
of Energy until 2001. Summarizing
his decade of daily experience
dealing with threats, Habiger offered a
categorical conclusion about nuclear
terrorism: "it is not a matter of if; it's a
matter of when."
"That," Keller noted drily, "may
explain why he now lives in San
Antonio."
In the end, the Dragonfire report
turned out to be a false alarm.