DLC - Democratic Leadership Council
Democratic Leadership Council Home
Search Tips 



PrintPrintable Version of this Article

Send this Article to a FriendSend this Article to a Friend

Related Links Blueprint: The Citizenship Issue



Ideas




National Service & Civic Enterprise
National Service

DLC | Blueprint Magazine | April 1, 1999
Work-Study
Service for Communities, Not Colleges

By Thomas Ehrlich

Table of Contents

When it adopted the federal work-study program as part of the Higher Education Act of 1965, Congress made its intentions clear. Along with helping college and university students pay for their schooling through part-time employment, the twin purpose of the program was to encourage students to participate in community service activities that would benefit local communities and engender in students a sense of social responsibility.

Yet, over the last three decades, the program has drifted away from that original purpose. While a few campuses, such as Case Western Reserve, dedicate more than half their work-study funds to community service, they are the rare exceptions. At most colleges and universities, work-study funds serve primarily to finance low-skilled jobs such as sorting mail or serving food that may very well assist campuses in meeting budgets, but are unrelated to societal needs or the personal goals of students. These jobs are far removed from work-study's supposed purpose of service to the community. It is long, long past time for Congress and the Administration to insist that the work-study program place equal emphasis on its second original intention.

This year about 930,000 students will receive more than $870 million in financial aid through the work-study program, an eight-fold increase from 1965. But the growth has come without much attention to the original Congressional aim of placing students in community service positions. A 1991 General Accounting Office study made clear that only a tiny fraction of students receiving work-study funds were then engaged in community service. In response, Congress amended the Higher Education Act to require that at least 5 percent of work-study funds be used for students engaged in community service. That requirement will increase to 7 percent, beginning in fiscal year 2000.

Even with this improvement, only about one out of every fifteen work-study dollars will be required for community-service. This is simply not enough. As a down payment on returning to the original congressional vision, at least one half of work-study funds should be earmarked for community service use. This step will be in the direct interest of students, of their colleges and universities, and - most importantly - of communities everywhere.

Our democracy depends on active and engaged citizens working together for their communities. This is exactly what community service encourages. Students come to understand what problems the community faces, the richness of its diversity, the need for individual commitments of time and energy to enhance civic life, and most of all the importance of working as a community to resolve common concerns. Community service is a powerful antidote to the dangerous disengagement of college-age youth in the civic processes that are essential for our society.

Particularly when linked to academic study and structured reflection in what has come to be termed "service learning," community service can help students gain more insight into their academic courses as well as a better understanding of who their neighbors are and what they owe to each other.

Work-study funds can readily be linked to service learning courses. Students gain academic credit for their course work and financial aid for their community service, while the academic and the community work both strengthen and reinforce each other. Colleges and universities will benefit because the use of work-study funds for community service can be a powerful means for recruiting community-spirited students. Most importantly, campuses will increasingly be seen as preparing good citizens and as good citizen partners.

At the same time, a 50 percent community service requirement will enormously benefit cities and towns that desperately need workers to help build their communities. Two recent programs begun by the Administration underscore how such help can be used. America Reads, which encourages work-study students to serve as reading tutors in elementary schools, has already attracted thousands of tutors. A similar effort, called America Counts, is expanding federal work-study to encourage mathematics tutoring.

In his 1996 commencement address at Penn State University, President Clinton made the case for such a change: "If it's good for students to earn money by putting books back in library shelves or working in the Dean's Office, surely it makes sense for them to earn money helping teen mothers handle their responsibilities, helping older people get around, helping young people to look to a brighter future." He was right. It is time now for Congress to reaffirm that community service is one of the twin purposes of the work-study program, and to require that at least half of each institution's work-study funds be used for that purpose.

Thomas Ehrlich is Distinguished University Scholar at California State University and Senior Scholar at The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching. He is also President Emeritus of Indiana University and a member of the Board of Directors of the Corporation for National Service.