Coincidentally, April 25 was almost 10 years to the day that I journeyed to Little Rock, Ark.,
to recruit then-Gov. Clinton to become chairman of the Democratic Leadership Council. Many of
the New Democrat themes and ideas developed during his chairmanship have defined the Third
Way in America. As President, Clinton put those themes and ideas into action.
Shortly after the 1992 presidential election, Tony Blair, who was then the British shadow
home secretary and just beginning his efforts to modernize the Labour Party, paid his first call on
us. Today, as Robert Philpot notes, Prime Minister Blair enjoys approval ratings not
seen in Britain since the days of Winston Churchill.
The President best summarized our progress in his speech to the DLC last December.
"These words -- opportunity, responsibility, community -- came to identify and embody a
new approach to government and politics, tying our oldest, most enduring values to the
Information Age," he said. "We said we were New Democrats, and we called our
approach the Third Way.
"These same ideas are reviving center-left political parties throughout the
industrialized world as people everywhere struggle to put a human face on the global
economy," the President continued. "And it all started with the DLC ... Today, less
than 15 years after we started, the ideas pushed by the DLC are literally sweeping the
world."
With that incredible track record, you'd think our ownership of Third Way politics would be
undisputed. Think again. The 2000 election will likely be a battleground for possession of the
Third Way.
The evidence is clear: Republicans are trying to steal our politics. They're not even being
subtle about it. Two GOP groups, The Republican Main Street Partnership and the Republican
Leadership Council, have sprung up explicitly to emulate the success of the DLC.
The Republican Main Street Partnership is a group of moderate House Republicans led by
Rep. Amo Houghton of New York -- one of a handful of Republicans who had the courage to
vote against the articles of impeachment lodged against the President. But Houghton makes no
bones about what his group is up to. In a recruitment letter to DLC supporters recently, he wrote:
"The Republican Main Street Partnership was created early last year to mirror much of
what the DLC has done ... and we are borrowing heavily from the DLC success story."
The New York Times says the RLC "unabashedly seeks to replicate the methods and
successes of the Democratic Leadership Council."
Then there's copycat GOP presidential candidate George W. Bush, the Texas governor, who
is now the party's frontrunner for the 2000 nomination. All last fall during his gubernatorial re-
election campaign, he traveled across the state in a bus with the words "opportunity"
and "responsibility" plastered on the side. I call that New Democrat Lite.
Now Bush calls himself a "compassionate conservative." That seems to me to be
the latest effort by Republicans to do for their party what New Democrats did for ours in 1992
to redefine and capture the political center.
Imitation may be the sincerest form of flattery. But for Democrats, imitation in this case
poses a serious political challenge. We can't afford to take this intellectual piracy lightly.
The actions of many congressional Republicans notwithstanding, not all Republicans are
fools. Republican governors in particular understand the power of the New Democrat message.
They know it is a winning political formula precisely because its ideas work. And they are bound
and determined to steal that formula from us.
But the would-be Republican hijackers face great obstacles. For one thing, there aren't many
GOP centrists left. They've been systematically purged from their party for the past quarter
century.
More importantly, opportunity for all, mutual responsibility, and fostering community aren't
exactly Republican themes. Unlike New Democrats, most Republicans believe that economic
and social progress is generated by the efforts of a few wealthy elites, not by the talents of all us.
They tend to embrace President Reagan's ethic of every man for himself, not President's
Kennedy's ethic of asking what you can do for your country. And they tend to view government
as an alien creature to be stamped out wherever possible, not the agent of our collective will and
our instrument for helping Americans help themselves and each other.
Those facts give us a distinct advantage. But our continued possession of the Third Way in
2000 and beyond is not preordained. We will have to earn our ownership by keeping our politics
dynamic; by lifting it to the next plateau; by tackling today's and tomorrow's problems with
innovation, courage, and a dedication to New Democrat-Third Way principles. We cannot afford
to rest on President Clinton's successes; we need to build on them.
If we do, the differences between the imitation and the real thing will become very obvious.
And the success of the global Third Way movement -- so clear at the DLC forum on April 25 --
will be secured in the country that gave it birth.